I don't know of anyone that's actually complained of it. We just always advise against it as it's an unnecessary expense and performs worse than windows defender.Since BullGuard seems to be causing everyone lots of problems on their PC, why doesnt PCS choose to remove the option of it off their site? Do they not see the complaints from their customers because of it, or is BullGuard actually good?
I saw someone on the forums complain that their games were 20-30 fps lower with it installed on warzone, and once it was uninstalled they were back up at 60 fps gameplay with ease.I don't know of anyone that's actually complained of it. We just always advise against it as it's an unnecessary expense and performs worse than windows defender.
Same as most paid for AV, they’re all unnecessary and impact performance.I saw someone on the forums complain that their games were 20-30 fps lower with it installed on warzone, and once it was uninstalled they were back up at 60 fps gameplay with ease.
Thats what really made me think that bullguard is kind of just a ripoff and unnecessary for a machine to have.
I've analysed at least two kernel dumps on here where Bullguard drivers were the cause of the BDODs.I don't know of anyone that's actually complained of it. We just always advise against it as it's an unnecessary expense and performs worse than windows defender.
I had a problem caused by it, and there was a post on here the other day where bullguard was the cause of a faultI don't know of anyone that's actually complained of it. We just always advise against it as it's an unnecessary expense and performs worse than windows defender.